Dec 30, 2008
Politics is not Football
Dec 26, 2008
Post No Bills - Happy Holidays
Dec 22, 2008
Buying in 2009
What worries me about buying now is:
1. Buying at too high a price and losing significant value on my property because of surrounding property principle reductions.
2. Buying into a community with huge foreclosure interest that hasn't been realized yet.
3. Missing out on one of the sure to be infinite number of programs that both private institutions like banks and homebuilders and the government will put into place to entice first time homeowners. It would really suck to buy a house in March only to have record low interest rates or rebates introduced in June.
Dec 19, 2008
Tips for Rich People
Dec 17, 2008
Dynastic?
Dec 16, 2008
Baked In Schmaked In
Krugman has some opinions on this, mainly that it's not good and that we're dangerously close to a liquidity trap, which I compare to being off balance on the ledge of the abyss.
I'm not as concerned with that as I'm upset with myself regarding my trades today. I, as well as most traders, were expecting a half percent. When news hit of a quarter percent, my target stocks shot straight up with the Dow closing up 349 points! And like an idiot I missed every point of it. I like to take my long or short positions prior to major announcements, and because I was expecting a half instead of a quarter point I stayed on the sidelines anticipating what I call a baked in sell off. I guess not.
The hardest thing to do is to not throw away money tomorrow trying to over compensate for missing huge gains today. Hopefully we get a pullback and then more momentum the rest of the week that I can get a piece of.
Dec 15, 2008
Old Guard...
But for me the newspaper decline is emblematic of a broader old v new mentality, that has more to do with lazy v creative than young v aged.
Like the big autos, record companies and video stores, the newspapers have no one to blame but themselves. Instead of embracing and frontrunning the literally endless ways to monetize digital content the old guard did everything in their power to curtail it (Napster anyone?) and squeeze every cent out of their crusty b-models of yore. In the meantime Netflix, Apple and opportunistic bloggers were running right past them to the black.
What confounds me is HOW the old guard missed the boat so many times? Not to brag, but 6 years ago when the paradigm shifted from video cassette to DVD I recognized at 22 that a mail order model was no longer cost prohibitive and should be developed...by Blockbuster. But apparently they made too much money from late fees and didn't want to give that up...in other news today Blockbuster closed at $1.57, Netflix at $28.49. I guess Blockbuster.
Thomas Friedman had a great article over the weekend called "While Detroit Slept" you should check it out if you get some time. It deals with this old v new way of thinking and how the businessmen, entrepreneurs and creative individuals embracing 21st century technologies, cultures and methodologies are sure to run laps around the old guard...I'll see you at the finish line dude.
You gotta admit...
Watch how fast dude chucks the first shoe...hahahaha
Dec 14, 2008
Bacevich I
"The 19 hijackers that killed 3000 Americans on 9/11 didn't succeed because they had advanced technology, because they were particularly smart or because they were 10 feet tall. They succeeded because we let our guard down and we were stupid."
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd-Andrew Bacevich
"Why were scissors and box cutters allowed on planes?" This was my first thought in the wake of 9/11 followed by how stupid it was that they were. Seriously. I'm certain Bacevich's criticism extends to intel and policy, but I'll always be mystified at the utter stupidity of allowing shanks on a plane.
I've always thought like Bacevich regarding 9/11 but was so worried about the pervasive 'with us or against us' culture that proceeded, outcasting anyone who didn't parrot Bush's narrative as unpatriotic. Were the hijackers responsible? Yes. Should we (TSA, NTSB, et al) have let them board with shanks? No. Would they still have been able to hijack the plane w/o their shanks? Maybe, maybe not. However, I can say with certainty that it's infinitely harder to kill a man with your bare hands than with a knife...err box cutter or scissor.
Gate Agent: Sir we don't allow knives on the plane.
Passenger: It's a box cutter, not a knife...see?
Agent: Oh! Well in that case go right ahead, you're in seat 57.
Dec 12, 2008
Did This Week Just Happen????
Dec 11, 2008
Stupid...Stupid...Stupid
Dec 10, 2008
Milwaukee Bucks...
It's an attractive idea when times are tight. Communities print what look like ordinary bills with serial numbers, anti-counterfeiting details and images of local landmarks (the Milwaukee River, for instance) instead of presidential portraits. Residents benefit through an exchange system: 10 traditional dollars, for instance, nets them $20 worth of local currency.
And when businesses agree to value the funny money like real greenbacks, they also get a free stack to kick-start spending.
-Pam exchanges $20 for 40 milwaukee buck (mb) a 2:1 mb/$ exchange rate
-The "community treasury" now has $20 on reserve as Pam is the only person using mb's so far
-The local restaurant charges Pam 40mb ($20) for dinner. If they were to charge less in mb's than the dollar exchange rate they would be losing money.
-The "community treasury" issues the business an additional 20mb for participating in the program
-The local restaurant has to pay their supplier from New York who doesn't accept mb's
-The restaurant goes to exchange their 60mb's for dollars
-The "community treasury" gives them the only $20 they have on reserve at a 3:1 exchange rate
I guess if the "community treasury" restricted the exchange of non dollar backed mb's or merchants repriced in mb's daily based on the quoted exchange rate this could work, but at some point an mb will have to leave the community in the form of a dollar and if the currency is inflated (getting weaker against the dollar) someone's gonna get shafted.
Dec 9, 2008
Attribution
Internal: In the semi-final matchup in the NCAA Final Four John torches the opponents for 37 points. After the game he credits his hard work over the summer and his extra preparation in the previous days practice.
External: In the championship game John scores only 9 points and misses a game high 17 shots. After the game he mentions the coaches flawed game plan and the inability of his teammates to get him the ball.
As a consultant I can say that many business people lauded themselves ad infinitum for their success during the boom. They were high on internal, rolling in bonuses and ego. Now that the growth by default business environment has passed those same individuals are finding fault in an external a.k.a "the economy." Nothing on the downside has to do with their skillset or lack thereof, their failure is all beyond their control.
While it's front and center in the business community at the moment, this is a fairly common condition in all humans and takes a lot of practice and focus to fix. With a lot of honesty and a little analysis anyone can find the appropriate mix to explain a success or failure, the trick is wanting to do so...afterall why credit fortuitous timing or serendipity when you can credit yourself? I'm competitive so I'm always assessing myself after a failure. Even if it's clearly external I hate the thought of my fortunes being out of my control.
But I guess if I was an exec with millions of dollars of bonuses on the line, I could find total fault in a defenseless economy...I guess.
Rod...Whiskey Tango Foxtrot???
A friend of mine told me the feds rarely indict unless their case is airtight, so I have to assume some of what is being reported is credible. Accepting that, this guy has to be one of the most brazen elected 'corrupters' in modern history.
Dec 8, 2008
Going to Extremes
The crisis is on display here. Starla D. Darling, 27, was pregnant when she learned that her insurance coverage was about to end. She rushed to the hospital, took a medication to induce labor and then had an emergency Cesarean section, in the hope that her Blue Cross and Blue Shield plan would pay for the delivery.
I'm certain there will be hundreds of thousands of laid off workers losing coverage over the next 2 years and I wonder how many of them will have to go to extremes. I'm not sure there is a healthcare solution to prevent further Starling's, typically you would look to the government but both state and federal have their hands full with this quickly worsening recession and frankly the money for Obama's healthcare reform is probably off the table.
Maybe a short term solution is to revise Cobra to extend to bankrupt companies??? But even then the worker is responsible for 100% of their premiums and I'm not sure how many workers can afford that during unemployment?
One silver lining is that Starla's got a new little person which is pretty awesome!
Dec 7, 2008
Chalk It Up
O taps Shinseki for VA Secretary
David Gregory gets Meet the Press
Dec 6, 2008
Class warfare? No thanks, not now.
"Across cultures, religions, union and nonunion, we all say this bailout was a shame," said Richard Berg, president of Teamsters Local 743. "If this bailout should go to anything, it should go to the workers of this country."
Unfortunately this class warfare rhetoric, stoked incessantly over the last 8 years, really does no one any good in a crisis. Conservative or progressive, labor or management, the truth is the bank bailout was necessary. It's true, a window manufacturer and a bank are both businesses ultimately responsible for their own P&L. But it's also true that a bank and a window manufacturer vis-a-vis trade and commerce are not equal. Unfortunately banks are waaaay more important to the functioning of this system and thus must be treated as such...this is just a fact.
Dec 5, 2008
The -flation Wars
Inflation: Prices are rising - A pair of Air Jordans went from $100 in Jan, to $125 in Feb, to $150 in Mar.
Disinflation: Prices are rising, just not as fast - Those same Jordans go to $155 in April and to $159 in May.
Deflation: Prices are falling fast - Those Jordans fall to $135 in June, $105 in July and $85 in August.
Most opponents of the bailout are concerned the increase in money supply will cause prices to rise because there will be more dollars competing for the same amount of goods. I'm not totally convinced of that in this instance, mainly because so much wealth has been destroyed, but in theory this is correct. Fortunately there's a known fix for inflation. Raise the interest rate, make it more expensive to buy money, decrease the money supply and voila bye, bye inflation.
But deflation is like Macaulay Culkin in The Good Son...outright nefarious. It's part of the vicious cycle I've blogged about ad nauseam. With deflation people begin assuming prices will continually drop. So instead of buying that tv today I wait...and wait...and wait, and since it's not something I absolutely need I wait some more. All of this waiting eventually forces prices to the point of loss or nominal profitability for the seller, which in turn causes them to layoff workers, which in turn drives up unemployment and exacerbates the recession and the deflationary spiral further.
The antidote for deflation is the exact opposite of inflation, to lower interest rates and increase the money supply (in essence encouraging inflation). What makes this antidote less effective is twofold. First you can only decrease rates to 0% (unlike its infinite converse), and with rates already low there's not much ammunition there. Second is human emotion. Once society has been conditioned to expect lower prices, it's hard to reverse that course of thinking especially in a recessionary environment where people are already skiddish about spending.
I'm sure there's someone out there reading this thinking "This sounds like an after Christmas sale, what's wrong with waiting for prices to drop?" Nothing. If it's just one cheapo who's waiting for clearance. But if the masses are indefinitely waiting, then they're not spending which is a problem in a consumption economy.
There are few other types of -flation that only the wonkish care about and in general a little disinflation is pretty harmless.
Sardonic...I can't help it.
Oh, he's on...let me listen now, more later!
Update 10:34: He kept it short and sweet and the markets held steady, he's learning!
The Jobs Report
Dec 4, 2008
0-10
Thanks Big Ten, that's really something all Midwesterner's can be proud of. I particularly liked the way the ACC's best (Duke/UNC) came onto the homecourt's of our best (Purdue/MSU) and mopped the floor with them...way to compete guys.
This is why you plan!
Case in point: Sending out massive surplus checks, unnecessarily cutting or flatlining taxes and FAILING TO DECREASE SPENDING during a boom is a sure fire recipe for massive deficits during a contraction...as my state has just found out. What's weird is that even a bush league MBA could tell you that you need to maintain adequate capital reserves, before increasing salaries, paying massive bonuses or allocating more for capex.
Note to Pols: If a thing can't go on forever, it won't.
Funny Stuff: Mascot Fight
WARNING: The Duck is absolutely hilarious. Watch the way he kicks the cheerleaders cone at the end...hahahaha!
Dec 3, 2008
Japan Stimulus: Failure or Failure of Execution
Since I don't know enough about 90's style Japan economics to comment on whether the stimulus worked I won't. However, I will point out that it is entirely plausible that if it didn't work, the reason could be poor execution instead of a bad plan.
Since the parallels between business and athletics are endless I will demonstrate with a sports metaphor:
In order for Small State University to beat North Carolina in the championship b-ball game the coaches decide to use a 2-3 zone. If Small State loses by continuously flubbing assignments, failing to box out and not challenge jump shooters, should we just grossly conclude that North Carolina can't be beat using a 2-3 zone. Or should we review the film and determine if, Small State had boxed out, not flubbed assignments and challenged shooters, they could have won with the 2-3.
I get the feeling that those, like Kudlow and Chuck Gasparino, are well aware of the fact that the stimulus in Japan could have been too small, allocated inappropriately or flubbed in some other way. But why contend that when you can always default to your trusty contention of upper class and business tax cuts?
Dec 2, 2008
ACC/Big Ten Challenge
Time for your monthly Auto-Bailout Redux
...there is some waitress scraping by, waiting tables for $6 per hour at a diner in California. Why should we give her tax dollars to Detroit so that they can continue overpaying the unions to sit around.
First it's perfectly plausible that said waitress sees the connection between Detroit and her job, and thus is for the bailout, in which case he is now as well, based on his argument. Second since a dollar of tax revenue is the same regardless of the source, her fictionalized struggle is ad hominem at best, only inserted to appeal to emotion and thus wholly irrelevant, making the argument as such too. Lastly, and I've addressed this before, anyone blaming the unions is simply blowing smoke. The unions signed a contract to trade labor for money. Whoever agreed to pay them should draw conservative ire, not unions.
On another note, it's pretty clear the waitress is a smokescreen. What he's really concerned with is the allocation of upperclass (his) tax dollars to Detroit a.k.a the unions a.k.a working class, as he sees it. For him this is some form of nefarious wealth redistribution, one that doesn't redistribute to his own pockets which means that it cannot be tolerated.
Dec 1, 2008
True to Form
It's Official!
I don't want to be a negative Ned but I've said here a couple times that I think the globe, led by the US, is in for some pain over the next year or maybe more. To anyone remotely familiar with the concepts of business and economic cycles this shouldn't be a surprise. Our market in almost every industry was way oversold and thus must come back down. This is precisely why you budget and spend responsibly during times of excess, this goes for individuals, businesses and governments.
The govt will do all that it can to minimize the pain, but it will still hurt nonetheless and in the end the govt can only pump in so many monopoly dollars before our economy becomes ersatz. As a country we are going to have to return to net or marginally deficient trade balances, which indicate REAL NEW dollars being introduced into our economy. We've got to develop some type of technology, widget or knowledge that we can sell en masse to the rest of the world. A country of our size can't maintain dominance by being a service based economy, we can't all sell insurance.