Intuitively you would think policymakers would get long term spending inline with projected revenues. You would think. I've said it once I'll say it again, business people in general would make much better politicians than lawyers. They don't spend more than they take in. If they do they fail. Simple. The finance part of of govt is and always will be superordinate to actual law making always.
From the Star Tribune
"The fiscally appropriate thing to do would be to create a permanent solution." But it's hard to sell painful long-term solutions when quick fixes are at hand, even though an aging population means the state's long-range budget outlook is troubled.